Property law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Property law - Assignment Example One of the intriguing viewpoints about this issue is that the idea of commitment changed starting with one inhabitant then onto the next. The realities show that my customer is the occupant of a Victorian Townhouse. The realities additionally show that my customer isn't the first inhabitant, and that the rent was appointed to my customer three years prior. It might be gathered that maybe the past customer, the person who really made the first rent with the proprietor, was a private tenant, as the structure is a home, and the character of the rent changed when the first tenant relegated their rent to the current lessor, who is clearly a business tenant, as they are utilizing the space for a book shop. In this manner, two distinct pieces of the Landlord Tenant Act may apply in this circumstance. The first tenant, if the first tenant was a private resident, would fall under the initial segment of this Act, and the current renter, who is a business, would fall under the second piece of t he Act. This is on the grounds that the initial segment of the Act is named â€Å"Security of Tenure for Residential Tenants,† and the arrangements in this part apply just to private occupants. The second piece of the Act is named â€Å"Security of Tenure for Business, Professional and Other Tenants,† and it, obviously, applies to business interests, for example, the one in the reality design. In this way, two distinctive investigation should be performed †one examination for the first occupant, and one for the current inhabitant, who is our customer. The reality design demonstrates that, for the first renter, the first rent was executed in 1997 and incorporated a fix agreement, wherein the first resident was to play out the important fix work to keep the structure in inhabitable condition, and this included enrichments, divider surfaces, window outlines, coating and casements. In addition, in the first rent, there was arrangement for lease audit in the fifth, ten th and fifteenth long stretches of the rent and that the rent may end on the sixteenth year, by giving a half year notice, given that the resident really played out the obligations that were expected of that occupant under this rent. Along these lines, the condition that the first tenant marked with the landowner will go under the Landlord Tenant Act 1954  § 8. This arrangement expresses that when an inhabitant and landowner concur that the occupant is to play out specific fixes on the structure, and these fixes are not made, at that point the proprietor may charge the inhabitant the sensible estimation of the fixes (Landlord Tenant Act 1954  § 8). This doesn't appear to be an excessively draconian answer for the issue, in the event that it is resolved that there should be fixes made and the occupant will not make the fixes - the proprietor can essentially make the vital fixes himself, which for this situation would remember supporting the splits for the roof, and fortifying the floor joists with the goal that the abundance load doesn't bring about additional breaks, and could then charge the renter the fundamental charges that the landowner would acquire in completing this. However there is a progressively draconian arrangement in the Landlord Tenant Act 1954 with regards to residents who will not play out the provisions of the rent. For this situation, the provisions of the rent are that the renter plays out the fix work that guarantees that the residence in inhabitable, and, expecting that having breaks in the roof make the abode untenantable, at that point a refusal to manage this issue may be cause for